|
| |
|
hd |
|
Back to Home Page |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Consanguinity |
|
|
|
|
I K Jalili |
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
Definition of consanguinity |
9.4 Subtypes of consanguinity |
|
|
|
|
9.2
Consanguinity throughout history |
9.5 Prevalence of consanguinity |
|
|
|
|
9.3 Why consanguinity |
9.6 Deleterious effect of consanguinity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References |
9.10 disabilities in blindness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
Definition of
Consanguinity |
| |
|
Consanguinity is a
marriage between relatives and has various degrees. Closely related
individuals have a higher chance of carrying the same alleles than those
less closely related and therefore children from consanguineous marriages
are more frequently homozygous for various alleles than those from
non-consanguineous unions. (1) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
Consanguinity throughout History
|
|
|
|
Consanguinity has been afforded various degrees of legitimacy by different
societies and at different times in history. This would therefore explain
brother/sister marriage as practised between the members of the reigning
dynasty of ancient Egypt and the Incas who considered ‘royal blood’ only
worthy of mixing with each other. It is interesting to note that despite
consanguinity with sisters among the Pharaohs, no ocular defect was
recorded until the 18th generation.(2) In Biblical heritage, Abraham’s
first wife, Sarah, was his step sister. |
|
|
9.3 |
Why Consanguinity? |
|
|
|
Several factors contribute to consanguinity. These are economic and
cultural factors, encounter, social and cultural isolation. In Bedouin,
the reasons given for favouring cousin marriages were clan solidarity,
interpersonal compatibility, preservation of family property, parental
authority, and social protection for women.(3) Bener found in Al-Ain, UAE
that the only significant variable was the husband’s education and
parent’s consanguinity. (4) The frequency of consanguinity in
this region was found to increase significantly with the improvement of the husband’s
educational level; however, this does not seem the case in other regions
such as Jordan.(5)
Social Concepts and Consanguinity
The practise of consanguinity is usually cultural rather than religious
and this was demonstrated by Tirosh who studied the practice in his survey
of infants with visual deficits in Northern Israel.(6) Consanguinity was
present in three of the ethnic groups studied. The rates recorded were
Druze (85%), Christian (77%) and Muslim (72%) thus demonstrating that
religious observances in some countries were outweighed
Social and Geographical Isolation
In addition to this form of consanguinity, is that where groups of people
live in small isolated pockets which results is social isolation. Under
these circumstances, the group from which a mate must be selected is
small; therefore the proportion of first cousins in it is higher than in
larger populations and random mating will more often result in
consanguinity. This has been demonstrated in varying degrees of
consanguinity for such isolated groups e.g. in an alpine community in
Switzerland (11.5%), a district in Northern Sweden (6.8%) and a Brazilian
group (20%). (1) Other examples of genetic isolates are the populations of
Newfoundland and Labrador. (7), (8), (9) where inbreeding is common, and
also in islands such as Cyprus where the whole island has become
practically one large family despite the fact the first cousin marriages
are forbidden by the Greek Orthodox Church. (10) In the former, it was
suggested that the continuing high prevalence of genetic blindness in this
province could be attributed to the genetic structure of the population,
which derives from natural increase by settlers who arrived from highly
circumscribed areas of Southwest England and Southern Ireland before 1835
and there is very little migration into these communities.(9) Thus,
frequencies of specific recessive disorders may be increased owing to
inbreeding from mating between distant relatives and the frequency of a
recessive disorder is reasonably attributed to ‘founder effect’; a finding
similar to Fraser’s group of sex-linked myopia in South Australia. (11)
Genetic Non-Relatedness
Consanguinity and genetic non-relatedness cannot be sharply distinguished
from one another. There are many people descended from common ancestors
who are unaware of the fact that they are related. In most geographical
areas, man does not reproduce within pedigrees which are completely
isolated from one another but, rather in a network of relationships which
joins all, or most strains together in a single reproductive unit. This is
the case even where branches of a society seem to be separated. Over
generations, prohibitions and barriers to intermarriage break down,
particularly as both legitimate and illegitimate unions lead equally to an
interchange of genes. That being the case, tracing of pedigrees of any
group of apparently unrelated individuals of similar territorial origin
will reveal that many of them possess a common ancestor. Therefore, if two
such people, who are apparently unrelated, marry, they do contract a
distant consanguineous marriage.(1)
Changing Trends and Non-Acceptance
Many societies now prohibit marriage between close relatives, perhaps as a
result of the observations on the progeny of consanguineous marriages.
These prohibitions vary in degree and in some countries include marriages
between second cousins. In addition to national laws governing marriage
between relatives, there are also religious laws that decree the levels of
consanguinity allowed. (1)
In addition to marriage between relatives, it is also custom, or law, for
marriages between unrelated persons to be prohibited. These have included
marriage between a person and his/her step-parent or between a person and
his/her deceased uncle’s/aunt’s spouse. These prohibitions are based
either on biological misconceptions or on non-biological grounds.(1)
Inbreeding is becoming less common worldwide except among genetic isolates
and regions where consanguinity is practiced. In Europe the change started
from the beginning of the last century. In Norway this became evident from
the 1920s onward. (12)
Even in social isolates, the fear of unhealthy offspring may also limit
consanguineous marriages as found in the Swiss group above which had a
lower frequency of cousin marriage (0.7%) as opposed to the Swedish group
(6.8%) although the size of the two groups were similar. (1) This would
seem to demonstrate that certain communities show a particular aversion to
such
marriages even within their isolated communities.
In Japan, (13) the trend of consanguineous marriage has been declining and
was found to be 8 times lower in younger groups than the oldest groups.
The overall rate of first cousin marriage in 1975 was reported at 2.23% in
rural districts and 1.77 in urban areas. No consanguineous marriage was
recorded in 32% of the 253 administrative units surveyed (There was also
interregional variation with the Kyushu district showing the highest
figures of inbreeding). Similarly, low consanguinity rates are found in
the European countries, (12), (14) among the indigenous communities.
In the Arab world, a display of the presence of consanguinity amongst the
various categories of visual loss has been demonstrated in a recent
retrospective study in Saudi Arabia. (15) |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
9.4 |
Subtypes of First Cousin Marriage
|
|
|
|
A brief outline in necessary because of the cultural concepts and the
misconceptions about various subtypes. This would be important in
advocacy. (Table 9.1)
In some communities particular emphasis is placed upon certain forms of
relationship such as type-A of cousin marriage ie the children of two
brothers, which is the commonest type of cousin marriage, the highest
being in Yemen. It is considered as the duty for the male to marry his
cousin and an obligation for the female to accept.(1) In Palestine, 20%
of marriages were between first cousins.(16) The same pattern was
reported in Pakistan where 60% of marriages are between first and second
cousins.(17) Type-B is the second most common ie between the children of
two sisters and it is believed that such marriages do not constitute a
close family marriage as the sisters are from different family from that
of the male cousin. In the Jewish society marriage between maternal uncle
and niece was also practised.(18) This practice has parallels with a
Chinese regulation whereby marriage between the children of a brother and
sister or of two sisters is acceptable as a consequence of the social
custom which assigned a woman to the family of her husband and thus
regarded children as ‘not belonging’ to the biological family of the
mother. However, the children of two brothers were considered to be of the
same family and were therefore prohibited from marrying, despite that
their genetic endowment is the same.(1) Similar cultural practices and
myth regarding the marriage between the children of a brother and sister
or of two sisters exist in Middle Eastern communities, but marriages
between the children of two brothers are favoured as mentioned above.(1)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Table 9.1 Subtypes of consanguineous
marriage 19 |
|
The first cousin
marriage can be subdivided into 4 types according to the relationship
of the parents. (1)
These
are classified according to the sex of the couple’s parents who are
sibs as follows: |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type A |
Type B |
Type C |
Type D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The marriage between the siblings of two brothers
(the commonest) |
The marriage of two siblings of two sisters. It
(second commonest) |
The marriage of two the male is the sibling of the
brother and the female is the sibling of the sister. |
The marriage of two cousins where the male is the
sibling of the sister and the female is the sibling of the brother. |
|
|
|
9.5 |
Prevalence of Consanguinity
|
|
|
|
Consanguineous marriage remains common in many parts of the world and has
been reported in various communities such as the Mormons. (27), (28) It is
especially common in most of the Middle-Eastern countries where the custom
in considered socially acceptable. (29), (30), (31), (16), (19), (20),
(25), (23), (32), (33), (34), (26) The same applies to other Muslim
countries and regions such as India, (35) Pakistan (17), (36), (37), (38),
(39) and Uzbekistan. (40) This practice continued in some of the
communities who settled the West such as the Pakistani community in the
UK.(16), (41), (42) (Table 9.2) demonstrates the frequency of
consanguinity in various parts of the world. In the Arab countries, consanguinity has been reported with the highest
frequency in Saudi Arabia (33) where it reaches 80% of marriages in
certain parts of the Kingdom. The available figures for other countries in
the Middle East and the rest of the world are shown in Table 9.2. Average
figures ranges between 59% among the Iraqis, (25) 40% among the
Palestinians, (30) 44% among the Yemenis in Sanaa’, (23) 49-58% among the
Jordanians (5), (19), (20) and 40-54% in the UAE.(24)
In Kuwait,(43) high
rates of consanguineous marriages within the various Arab communities,
with low frequency of intermarriage between them, and also the presence of
genetic isolates and semi-isolates in some extended families and Bedouin
tribes have been described. Consanguinity is less common in North African
Arab countries where it was reported to be 29% in Egypt, (32) however, in
another study on the Nubian population in southern Egypt the figures
ranged between 41.5-45.5%.(26) The highest rates of such marriages have
been reported in rural areas, among individuals with low educational
levels, and among the poorest.
In Morocco,(44) however, with its contact with the outside world, a
marked decrease in consanguineous unions is reported and consanguinity is
disappearing and does not present a preoccupying problem for public
health. However, this cannot be used as a generalisation as the trend has
increased in younger generations in other Arab countries such as the UAE
where the rate of consanguinity has risen from 39% in the parent
generations to 50.5% in the current generation.(24)
Available figures on consanguinity rates among the general population in
the West Bank and Gaza Strip came from Pederson and Saunders.(45), (46)
The latter studies the rate of consanguinity among Palestinians in all the
refugee camps in the Gaza Strip.(46) Saunders analysed data according to
the status of the household and professional status. The frequency of
consanguinity ranged between 53% to 69% (Table 9.3) and is not related to
the professional status of the person as figures were very similar in the
various categories ranging from 58% to 63%. This shows its prevalence in
this society.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table
9.2 Consanguinity rates and cousin marriages in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
of the West bank and Gaza Strip and
worldwide literature |
|
Cohort |
Cousin Marriages |
Distant a Relation |
Not
Related |
|
1st |
2nd |
Total |
|
Palestine (Jalili 1985-1987 - This study) |
|
WB |
347 |
72 |
- |
82b |
0 |
10 |
|
GS |
289 |
69 |
- |
93b |
93 |
0 |
|
Total OPT |
669 |
70 |
- |
86b |
- |
6 |
|
Genetic cases |
89 |
- |
- |
38 |
- |
- |
|
Acquired cases |
57 |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galilee 1984(11)
|
review |
- |
- |
39 c |
- |
- |
|
Druze |
- |
- |
- |
49 |
- |
- |
|
Moslems |
- |
- |
- |
40 |
- |
- |
|
Christians |
- |
- |
- |
29 |
- |
- |
|
Palestinian
village |
1875 |
20d |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| |
|
Jordan |
|
1980 (14)
|
1995 |
33 |
6.8 |
51 |
15.5 |
49.7 |
|
1992 15),(31) |
2000 |
32 |
6.8 |
49 |
10.5 |
50 |
|
2003 - S. Ghor
(56) |
608 |
- |
- |
58 |
- |
- |
|
Jordan 1992
(31) |
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genetic cases |
191 |
63.6 |
34.4 |
79 |
- |
21 |
|
Non-genetic |
69 |
52 |
48 |
33 |
- |
66 |
| |
|
Israel(56)
|
|
Israeli Jews |
4388 |
0.8 |
- |
2.3 |
- |
- |
|
Eastern Jews |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
| |
|
Other Arab and
Muslim Countries |
|
Yemen, Sanaa(17)
|
1050 |
71.6 |
- |
44.7 |
- |
- |
|
UAE (32) |
2033 |
29.7e |
- |
50.5 |
- |
- |
|
Al-Ain |
- |
32.7e |
1.6 |
54 |
- |
- |
|
Dubai |
- |
21.3 e |
6.7 |
40 |
- |
- |
|
Current
generation |
- |
- |
- |
50.5 |
- |
- |
|
Parent generation |
- |
- |
- |
39 |
- |
- |
|
Iraq (16) |
- |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Egypt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Egypt (16)
Nubian(21) |
- |
11.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Egypt 36 |
26,554 |
f |
- |
29 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 9.3 First
cousin marriage in refugees camps |
|
Status |
First Cousin |
Not
First Cousin |
Totals |
|
By Professional Status |
|
Professional |
63 |
37 |
908 |
|
Student |
60 |
40 |
127 |
|
Skilled worker |
56 |
44 |
1023 |
|
Labourer |
57 |
43 |
5317 |
|
Not working |
58 |
42 |
10775 |
|
Total |
50 |
41 |
18150 |
|
By Household (HH) Status
|
|
Head of the HH |
50 |
41 |
6207 |
|
Wife |
59.5 |
40.5 |
6409 |
|
Child of HH |
55 |
45 |
2434 |
|
Parent of HH |
69 |
31 |
170 |
|
Relation of HH |
53 |
47 |
3000 |
|
Total |
|
|
81220 |
|
Percentage in bold italics (Adopted
from Saunders CA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
9.6 |
Deleterious Effects of Consanguinity
|
|
|
|
The deleterious effects of consanguineous mating are high and predispose
the offspring to the effects of recessively inherited disease. This is
principally due to the frequency with which recessive genes exist over
dominant genes within the population.(47) The frequency of malformations was found to parallel the degree of consanguinity.(14)
Higher proportions of first cousin marriage than the proportion in the
general population have been reported in schizophrenia, (48) several
congenital heart defects such as septal defects (atrial, ventricular and
atrio-ventricular). Also reported are pulmonary stenosis and atresia, (49)
cystic fibrosis, cystinosis, nephronophthisis, spinal muscular atrophy,
albinism, achromatopsia, (50) hearing disorders, (51) and central nervous
system anomalies,(52) congenital anomalies, physical handicap, mental
retardation and malignancies.(53) In Kuwait, higher incidence of Meckel
syndromes, phenylketonuria, and familial Mediterranean fever have been
documented in cousin marriage.(43)
There is also an added risk of infant and child mortality.(45) Khlat and
Khoury (54) found that inbreeding generally increases pre-reproductive
mortality; crude mortality increases with inbreeding in proportion to the
mortality rate. Morbidity increases significantly with inbreeding.
Infant and under-5 mortality is higher in
first cousin marriage in Turkey.(55) Consanguinity can also influence the
age of menopause.(56)
The option of premarital carrier matching has been found to be acceptable
with the Bedouin Muslim community in Israel. This is a form of genetic
counselling where two individuals are told, if both are carriers, that
they have a 25% risk in each pregnancy of having a child affected by the
disease for which they are tested. If one individual is a carrier this
information is not disclosed. This method also is supposed to reduce
stigmatisation, especially of women.(3) |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References |
|
|
|
1. Stern C. Consanguinity. In: Principles of Human Genetics. Freeman WH &
Co. San Francisco, USA. 1973: 368-501.
2. Franschetti A. Commission of the International Association for the
Prevention of Blindness 1935.
3. Raz AE, Atar M. Cousin marriage and premarital carrier matching in a
Bedouin community in Israel: attitudes, service development and
educational intervention. J Fam Plann Reprod Heath Care 2004; 30: 49-51.
4. Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, al-Gazali LI, Micallef R, al-Khayat AI, Gaber
T. Consanguinity and associated socio-economic demographic factors in the
United Arab Emirates. Hum Hered 1996; 46: 256-64.
5. al-Salem M, Rawashdeh N. Consanguinity in north Jordan: prevalence and
pattern. Biosoc Sci 1993; 25: 553-6. .
6. Tirosh E, Schnitzer, MR, Atar S, Jaffe M. Severe visual deficits in
infancy in Northern Israel: An epidemiological perspective. J Pediatr
Ophthalmol Strabismus 1992; 29: 366-9. [Online]
7. Bear JC, Nemec TF, Kennedy JC, Marshall WH, Power AA, Kolonel VM, Burke
GB. Persistent genetic isolation on Outport / Newfoundland. Am J Med Genet
1987; 27: 807-30.
8. Green JS, Johnson GJ. Hereditary diseases as causes of blindness in
Newfoundland: preliminary report. Can J Ophthalmol 1983; 18: 281-4.
9. Green JS, Bear JC, Johnson GJ. The burden of genetic eye disease. Br J
Ophthalmol 1986; 70: 696-9.
10. Merin S, Lapithis AG, Horovitz, Michaelson IC. Childhood blindness in
Cyprus. Am J Ophthalmol 1972; 74: 538-42.
11. Fraser GR. The causes of severe visual handicap among school children
in South Australia. Med J Australia 1968; 16: 615-9.
12. Saugstad LF. Inbreeding in Norway. Ann Hum Genet 1977; 40: 481-91.
13. Imaizumi Y, Shinozaki N, Aoki H. Inbreeding in Japan: results of a
nation-wide study. Jap J Human Genet 1975; 20: 91-107.
14. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Feingold J. Parental consanguinity as a
cause of increased incidence of birth defects in a study of 131,760
consecutive birth. Am J med Genet 1994; 49: 114-7.
15. Tabbara FK, El-Shaikh MF, Shawaf SS. Pattern of childhood blindness at
a referral centre in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2005; 25: 18-21.
16. Zlotogora J, Habiballa H, Odatalla A, Barges S. Changing family
structure in a modernizing society: a study of marriage patterns in a
single Muslim village in Israel. Am J Human Biol 2002; 14: 680-2.
17. Hakim A. Comments on “Consanguineous marriage in Pakistan”. Pak Dev
Rev 1994; 33: 675-6.
18. Foreign & Commonwealth Office. Country Profiles. Middle East and North
Africa. http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename= OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid
=1007029394365&continent=3.(Accessed 23 July 2004)
19. Khoury SA, Massad D. Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. Am J Med Genet
1992; 43: 769-75.
20. al-Salem M, Rawashdeh N. Pattern of childhood blindness and partial
sight among Jordanians in two generations. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus
1992; 28: 361-5.
21. Sueyoshi S, Ohtsuka R. The effect of polygyny and consanguinity on
high fertility in the rural Arab population in South Jordan. J Biosoc Sci
2003; 54: 13-26.
22. Cohen T, Vardi-Saliternik R, Friedlander Y. Consanguinity,
intra-community and intercommunity marriage in a population sample of
Israeli Jews. Ann Hum Biol 2004; 31: 38-48.
23. Gunaid AA, Hummad NA, Tamim KA. Consanguineous marriage in the capital
city Sana’a, Yemen. J Biosoc Sci 2004; 36: 111-21.
24. al-Gazali LI, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Micallef R, al-Khayat AI, Gaber
T. Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci
1997; 29: 491-7.
25. Hamamy H, Alwan A. Hereditary disorders in the Eastern Mediterranean
Region. Bull World Health Organ 1994; 72: 145-54.
26. Badr FM. Genetic studies of Egyptian Nubian Populations: I. Frequency
and types of consanguineous marriages. Hum Hered 1972; 22: 387-98.
27. World Health Organization. Report of a WHO Advisory Group on
Hereditary Diseases. Geneva, 3-5 October 1985. Unpublished WHO document
HMG/AG/85.10.
28. Gilbert RE, Mulaik DD, Stephens FE, Woolf CM. An investigation of the
frequency of consanguineous marriages among the Mormons and their
relatives the United States. Am J Hum Genet 1956; 8: 236-52.
29. Klat M, Halabi S, Khudr A, Der Katousian VM. Perception of
consanguineous marriages and their genetic effects among a sample of
couples from Beirut. Am J Med Genet 1986; 25: 299-306.
30. Freundlich E, Hino N. Consanguineous marriage among rural Arabs in
Israel. Isr J Med Sci 1984; 20: 1035-8.
31. Zlotogora J, Shalev S, Habiballah H, Barjes S. Genetic disorders among
Palestinian Arabs: 3. Autosomal recessive disorders in a single village.
Am J Med Genet 2000; 92: 343-5. .
32. Hafez M, El-Tahan H, Awadalla M, El-Khayat H, Abdel-Gafar A, Ghoneim
M. Consanguineous mating in the Egyptian population. J Med Genet 1983; 20:
58-60 .
33. el-Hazimi MA, al-Swailem AR, Warsey AS, Sulaimani R, al-Meshari AA.
Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet 1955; 32:
623-6.
34. Sueyoshi S, Ohtsuka R. The effect of polygyny and consanguinity on
high fertility in the rural Arab population in South Jordan. J Biosoc Sci
2003; 54: 13-26.
35. Bittles AH, Hussain R. An analysis of consanguineous marriage in the
Muslim population of India at regional and state levels. Ann Hum Biol
2000; 27: 163-71.
36. Memon MS. Prevalence and causes of blindness in Pakistan. J Pakistan
Med Assoc 1992; 42: 196-8. .
37. Sethi S, Khan MD. Survey of Blind Schools in North West Frontier
Province (An Institutional Based Study). Pakistan J Ophthalmol 2001; 17:
90-6.
38. Afghani T. Causes of Childhood Blindness and Severe Visual Impairment
- Survey of the Blind Children from a Rural Population and
Schools for the Blind in an Urban Area. Pakistan J Ophthalmol 2000; 16:
4-25.
39. Butt NH. Childhood Blindness - Aetiological Pattern and Hereditary
Factors. Pakistan J Ophthalmol 2002; 18: 92-4.
40. Rogers NK, Gilbert CE, Foster A, Zahidov BO, McCollum CJ. Childhood
blindness in Uzbekistan. Eye 1999; 13: 65-70.
41. Darr A and Modell B. The frequency of consanguineous marriage amongst
British Pakistanis. J Med Genet 1988; 25: 186-90.
42. Schwarz K, Yeung S, Symons N, Bradbury J. Survey of school children
with visual impairment in Bradford. Eye 2002; 16: 530-4.
43. Teebi AS. Autosomal recessive disorders among Arabs: an overview from
Kuwait. J Med Genet 1994; 31: 224-33.
44. Lamdouar Bouazzaoui N. Consanguinity and public health in Morocco.
Bull Acad Natl Med 1994; 178: 1013-25. .
45. Pedersen J. The influence of consanguineous marriage on infant and
child mortality among Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, Jordan,
Lebanon and Syria. Community Genet 2002; 5: 178-81.
46. Saunders CA. A study of the prevalence of handicapping conditions
affecting children, and a case finding intervention in the refugee camp
population of the Gaza Strip. In: Health in the West Bank and Gaza Strip:
Health Development Information Project 1992:59.
47. McKuzick VA. Human Genetics, Prentice Hall inc. New York, 1964; 36-7.
48. Chaleby K, Tuma TA. Cousin marriage and schizophrenia in Saudi Arabia.
Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 547-9.
49. Becker SM, Al Halees Z, Molina C, Paterson RM. Consanguinity and
congenital heart disease in Saudi Arabia. Am J Med Genet 2001; 99: 8-13.
50. Tchen P, Bois E, Feingold J, Feingold N, Kaplan J. Inbreeding in
recessive diseases. Hum Genet 1977; 38: 163-7.
51. Zakzouk S. Consanguinity and hearing impairment in developing
countries: a custom to be discouraged. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116: 811-6.
52. Al-Gazali LI, Sztriha L, Dawodu A, Bakir M, Varghese M, Varady M,
Scorer J, Abdulrazzaq YM, Bener A, Padmanabhan R. Pattern of central
nervous system anomalies in a population with a high rate of
consanguineous marriages. Clin Genet 1999; 55: 95-102.
53. Abdulrazzaq YM, Bener A, al-Gazali LI, al-Khayat AI, Micallef R, Gaber
T. A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity. Clin Genet
1997; 51: 167-73.
54. Khlat M, Koury M. Inbreeding and disease: demographic, genetic and
epidemiologic perspectives. Epidemiol Rev 1991; 13: 28-41.
55. Tuncbilek E, Koc I. Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact
on fertility and mortality. Ann Hum Genet 1994; 58: 321-9.
56. Bener A, Rizk DE, Ezimokhai M, Hassan M, Micallef R, Sawaya M.
Consanguinity and the age of menopause in the United Arab Emirates. Int J
Gynaecol Obstet 1998; 60: 155-60.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|